Friday 12 May 2017

A history of fashion: regency era to modern day

A history of fashion: Regency era to modern day

Properly dressed ladies wore spencers (long-sleeved jackets cut beneath the bosom) or pelisses (long-sleeved jackets cut three-quarters down the length of a skirt) out of doors, along with a broad-brimmed hat tied under the chin with a ribbon.
Following the trend of women's fashions, men in the Regency era were dressed more soberly than their predecessors. The richly colored, brocaded suits were replaced by plain, dark cutaway coats which were especially practical for horsemanship. Knee breeches, stockings and buckled shoes gave way to pantaloons tucked into high riding boots. Finally, the powdered wigs of the Georgian era were forever relegated from fashion, as men of the period began wearing their hair short and natural[8].
Victorian Fashions
During the Victorian era, the precise cut, material and color of a garment revealed the social class of the wearer. With the growing prosperity of the day, fashions for women of the higher classes became increasingly complex. Dresses were composed of several layers of different shades, cloths and trimmings, and intended to be worn with both under-dresses and over-dresses. Properly dressed ladies accessorized with gloves and bonnets. Bustlines rose, as Victorian modesty gained widespread adherence; and waistlines fell as designers revived the popularity of formal dresses reminiscent of Georgian France. In the first quarter-century, puffy "mutton-leg" sleeves became all the rage, but these were later replaced by fitted sleeves and eventually bell sleeves. Victorians considered the "hourglass" shape to best flatter the female form, and women wore restrictive corsets to achieve this ideal. The Victorian era also saw the progression from crinoline skirts to hoop skirts and finally to bustled skirts. Finally, the invention of sewing machine revolutionized women's fashion on a practical level, as ladies devoted themselves to designing, customizing and making their own garments.
As for accessories of this era, the cameo became all the rage of the mid-19th century. Although Queen Elizabeth was known to favor cameos to complement her garments and Catherine the Great had an impressive collection as well, Queen Victoria revived the jewelry piece during her reign. Cameos during the Victorian era were often attached to a black velvet ribbon and worn as a choker. Jewelers during the nineteenth century used gemstones, stone, shell, lava, coral and manmade materials as mediums to carve cameos. Shell had been used by Italian carvers since 1805, and by the Victorian era, was the favorite material of cameo designers. Popular subjects for cameos included depictions of deities from Greek mythology (especially the Three Graces, the daughters of Zeus), the Biblical Rebecca at the well, and the Bacchante maidens adorned with grape leaves in their hair. The Victorians' appreciation for naturalism, especially their love of gardening, was also captured in cameos featuring flowers and trees. Finally, the Victorian woman of means often commissioned a cameo in her likeness, while other artists depicted an idealized woman with an upswept hairstyle and Romanesque features.
Men's fashions of the era were comparably more comfortable for the wearer. It was considered impolite society for a gentleman to appear in his shirt sleeves before a lady other than his wife, so Victorian men nearly always wore an informal "sack coat" during the day. The sack coat was a loose-fitting, single-breasted garment appropriate for travel or business, which was distinctive for its small collar, short lapels, a fastened top button close to the neck, moderately rounded hems, flap or welt pockets on the hips, a welt pocket on the chest and a slightly baggy appearance. Men's formal attire consisted of a top hat, dapper cutaway coat or frockcoat, waistcoat, cravat and trousers[6].
Edwardian Fashions
At the advent of the Edwardian era, the shape of women's fashions transitioned from the popular "hourglass" figure to dresses designed with an "S" curve. The new style allowed women to cast away the confining corsets of the Victorian age and embrace the new "health corsets" that supported the spine and abdomen. The curvaceous clothing line of this period resounded with the curving lines of Art Nouveau style. In addition, ladies' hats became larger, a trend that continued steadily until 1911. The Art Nouveau style also invaded women's jewelry styles, as peacocks, dragonflies and moths created out of dazzling enamels and gold filigree became standard adornments for ladies' combs and brooches.
Throughout the Edwardian period, women's fashions were highly influenced by the advancing feminist Suffrage movement. Women modeled their behavior and appearance upon the "Gibson Girl", the popular image of the "New Woman". Designers soon borrowed from men's clothing styles such as the suit, shirt, hard collar and tie, to create fashions appropriate for women entering professions formerly occupied by men.
During the later half of the Edwardian era, fashions once again transitioned from the "S" curve dresses to the pre-flapper, straight-line clothing of the late 1910s. As women began participating in athletics, casual and comfortable "sport clothing" also became popular. Women's fashions also generally became lighter in construction and materials, as epitomized by the "lingerie dress", a feather-light white cotton dress inset with strips of open-work lace and net. In sum, women's fashions became progressively more comfortable, practical and aesthetically pleasing during this era, such that the period from 1890 to 1914 is remembered as "la Belle Epoque" ("The Beautiful Epoch")[9].
Modern Trends of Fashion Design
Fashion is closely related with trend and requires the understanding of socio–cultural trends. Fashion is a field of cultural pluralism in which differences coexist. This specific field seems to show new praxis and methodologies in which businesses are able to continuously innovate products according to social and cultural changes. All these theories are expressions of deep changes that influenced fashion during the 19th century. Born as a craft sector in the late 1880 in France, fashion, in the modern sense, was in the beginning a way to establish status and
class differentiation for small elites. Not until the end of 1960, that the social disorder and the contestation of bourgeois values have an important impact in the fashion sector: for the first time styles and taste from lower levels of society became dominant. In the late 70s, research for affordable and simple ways of dressing began the transformation of the sector from craft production to industrial production. This change was promoted by Italian companies, which at the time were already producing textile fabrics and knitwear and began collaborating with young designers, such as Armani and Versace. Since then, fashion began to lose its powerful "status" connotation to assume the role of "social" and "cultural" connotation (Bertola, 2001). Fashion is more and more related to cultural communities and to a plurality of life styles and behaviors. It is also often characterized by “fashions” which spread with a bottom up mechanism and start in the lower level of society (King 1981; Naisbit 1990; Morace 1996; Lopiano Misdo and De Luca, 1997).
Fashion Business in Italy & Trend Process
Italy was selected as the leader in fashion for this research in the trend process because Italian fashion is for everyone in society, and is not as exclusive as French fashion. Italian fashion, thus, is more rooted in cultural values and is more strongly associated with the trend process. In Italy, clothes and accessories related to an idea of aesthetic quality, functionality and comfort, constructing a modern and new environment for informal social interaction. While France focused on the idea of luxury and distinction, Italian fashion has been characterized from the beginning as an expression of a contemporary style, generally affordable and close to different social groups (Anderson Black and Garland 1975; Steel 1988; Testa and Savoiolo 2000). On the side of production, this leads Italian fashion to become an industrial sector able to produce massive quantities of products, while French fashion remains based on craft production characterized by sophisticated and expensive processes to guarantee high quality and personalized products (Burns and Bryant 1997).
From beginning, Italian designers had the ability to understand needs and meaning, embedding them into products to share values and culture in a local context. They designed for a niche market; a local cultural community. Later, during the 90s, deep changes in society occurred. Conditions such as the globalized market, people migrations, the capillary diffusion of communication means, influenced the way in which social communities became localized and diffused (Toffler 1990). Italian design began to change, trying to become an expression of a cultural global plurality, which today characterizes fashion (Davis 1992).
Corresponding to these changes in the 90s, organizations transformed their implicit sensitivity to the market into a structured process of understanding cultural evolution and the potentialities of "bottom-up" phenomena. This new process is related to all the activities, which occur before product development. The result of their process is usually a document using visual language to express a vision of potential evolution in culture, life styles and behaviors. This special activity is the starting point of a standard trend tracking and visualizing service. The trend process was continually developed, then speeds up through the driving forces of high competition, complex market segments, and advancement in technology in order to quickly collect and understand target user information. This led to high efficiency in using the information to embed user values in products and innovate according to social and cultural trends.
Fashion Business in Thailand & Trend Process
Thailand was selected as a follower in fashion in this research because it has been a manufacturing country with one of the highest exports in clothing. Since the rise of cheaper Chinese labor, the Thai government has been promoting the trend process to make Thailand more competitive in the global market.
The fashion business and industry in Thailand are different from those of Italy and France in that designers and manufacturers lack cooperation. In the case of in-house designers, when a designer proposes a new product different from the mainstream, manufacturers do not recognize nor support the significance of design novelty. Designer-owned brands also face a similar problem when the manufacturer refuses to do small orders, or if the design consists of details that have never been done before. This results in very high prices for products with distinctive design, mainly in a niche market as most consumers cannot afford them. Many “risk-free” manufacturers are more interested in copying already successful products. As they are mass-produced, the prices become lower, and also more affordable as well as popular for most domestic consumers.
In the west, the socio-cultural movement is the driving influence on consumer perception, lifestyle, and in fashion. On the contrary, consumers in Thailand accept any new trend without relating to any socio-cultural issue. In reverse, the mainstream trends influence consequent socio-cultural reactions (Cholachatpinyo 2003).
Nonetheless, the garment manufacturing and export industry of Thailand was one of the main revenues of the country in the beginning. Consumer preferences were not previously given importance as with other factors in manufacturing. Presently, the government’s policy is promoting the creation of value-added products more than OEM. Trend information, thus becomes a necessity in product planning and development for export. In 1994, the Department of Export Promotion, Ministry of Commerce began distributing awareness of trends for targeted export markets in other countries. Thereafter, the DEP held trade fairs to exhibit Thai design and production capabilities, including how Thai products go along or fit into some specific international trends.
Today, besides distributing trend awareness in the fashion industry, the Thai government also gives importance to a Thai identity or uniqueness for export products to compete globally. However, there are still obstacles in utilizing trend information in Thailand, as those in charge of design are often more like prototype makers or factory owners. The expectation for trend information is more a question of what style, color, or form to be made to minimize risks, not to understand the origins of trends in order to expand creativity.
Design organizations with a high sensitivity to new trends do not rely on secondary trend information; they always virtually and realistically travel and gain experience from foreign locales in orders to absorb new trends and new inspiration. With this level of personal and organizational capability, new trends can be also identified early on. Some of the leading fashion brands keep track of trend information in order to understand fashion movement, not to fully apply that information to their design, in order to exclude themselves from the mainstream players. However, the difference between Thai and Italian design organizations is that the Italians work closely with suppliers to develop specific materials to fit right into the new trend during their product development, while Thais rarely have such cooperation.
Early and medium trend follower
In Italy, the design organization uses trend resources as a major information supply. Traditionally, the success relies upon sensible and profound interpretation of the readers, common to most Italian design organizations. In Thailand, in contrast, where the affordability of this trend resource is comparatively low, there are only a few companies who have access to it. Therefore, only few individuals have a chance to develop such processes. However, since successful trend application depends on such skills mentioned, Thais seem to not fully benefit from this open-to-all-interpretation trend resource, provided mostly by the government, as they lack the skills to understand the meaning that the trends suggest and the evolution of the past to present and future trends.
The emerging trend in Italy is a workshop held between trend institutes and their clients in order to efficiently apply trend information to their products during the product development stage. Compared with Italy, the Thai government’s organizations, such as the Department of Export Promotion and Thailand Creative and Design Center, will provide trend seminars about the current trend information to public. Short individual sessions of consultation about how they can apply the trend information to their products and other issues about product development of each design company will sometimes be arranged. However, limitations of time and budget makes it much less effective than the cooperative workshop done in Italy.
Late trend followers
The late trend followers usually have superficial understanding about the mechanism of trend information, even less in how that information could efficiently be applied to their products. Without considering the cause and effect of socio-cultural factors that drive those trends, form and colors proposed in either fashion magazine or fashion shows for the coming season are always far more than the important elements that they pay attention to in order to directly adopt it to fit their own brand identity and products. Since they do not fully understand the evolution of trends, the next trend is always a myth that therefore needs prediction rather than investigation and analysis that can be done by them.
Specializations in fashion designing have come into being. There is a wide range of options for a designer to choose from, such as lingerie, swimwear, women's wear, bridal wear, children's wear, men's wear, footwear, handbags, etc.
Another significant change that has come about in the fashion designing industry in recent times is the increased use of computers and technology. A number of software packages have come up to aid designers in the process of designing as well as other stages in the production of a garment, easily and speedily. Fashion designing as a trade has also grown. Fashion designers have gone on to get repute not only in their own countries, but internationally as well. The number of fashion shows and participation in the same has gone up considerably in recent times. Fashion designing is thus no longer only the designing and creation of a garment, but it is a world in itself involving fashion, design, creativity, technology as well as business.[12]
The type of clothing completely depends on the person who is wearing it; therefore it becomes a reflection of his perception of himself, which leads us to the term – personal identity. Lately a lot is being heard about personal identity and its meaning in the life of every single person on the planet. The choice of clothing and accessories (clothing that is worn or carried, but not part of a person’s main clothing) is as important as identification through the color of hair, height, skin and gender. Clothing nowadays is a media of information about the person wearing it [Barnard 21]. It is a cipher; a code that needs a decryption in order to understand what kind of person is underneath it. The present time offers a great variety of these “ciphers” and therefore gives people a large number of opportunities to reveal their identity. As every cloth carries a strong message about its owner, every owner “nests” a certain value in it depending on his temperament, mindset or today’s mood. Therefore, the clothing of a person is a mean of communication with the outside world. It is the way of telling people about the “state” and the “status” of it owner [Barnes& Eicher 125].


Gender issues in fashion

Gender issues in fashion

With reference to ethics, are there still gender issues/bias prevalent within sectors of fashion design and communication?
Gender issues and bias within the fashion industry have throughout history continually been a topic of debate, with the art versus the graphic sexualisation of both men and women in the name of fashion being a strong element. Especially in the last 10 to 15 years with the introduction of the internet and social media such as ‘Twitter’, this is allowing a person to air their views to the masses about such topics, which has paved a way for women such as Caryn Franklin to become an ambassador and a promoter of the issue of ethics in fashion. Caryn, Erin O’Connor and Debra Bourne co-founded the group ‘All walks beyond the catwalk’ which promotes diversity in the fashion industry a topic I will be delving into further within this essay. I will also be focusing on issues within the design process that have gender issues and bias associated with them such as, taking gender out of fashion design, the increase of designers using transgender models in both catwalk and campaigns such as Lea T, and Andrej Pejic and male designer dominance.
The fashion industry has always had gender specific clothing, clothes aimed and males and females, although this has remained the same many of the so called ‘rules of clothing’ has changed throughout the years such as shapes and colours associated with each gender specific item of clothing, with many of said rules intertwining at a point in history. ‘Prior to the 19th century, it was not unusual to see wealthy, fashionable men wearing stockings and heels which are now almost always marketed as for women and girls, plus its only since the 1940s that pink has been considered a ‘girly’ hue, with babies wearing dresses with no particular colour up to that point regardless of their gender’ Lorraine Smith, 2011. Fashion and Gender [Online] .In recent years there has been a sharp rise in the androgyny trend in multiple senses of the word. In Women’s fashion structured plain clothes such as suits have increased massively in colours grey, black and white, both typically being shapes and colours of men’s fashion, similarly Men’s fashion has seen an increase in bright colours, and fitted shapes that once again stereotypically would be more suited to a women. ‘Androgyny has always been a source of interest and intrigue. But as society’s boundaries have changed, so too have the masculine-feminine boundaries blurred’ Braukamper T. (2013) Androgynous fashion: Spring’s Evolution [Blog] ‘YouTube’ is a spectacular place where people can have their say, and after watching a handful of videos on the subject watching ‘VastisVoice’s’ Video ‘Breaking the gender mold’ made me delve further within the issues that may be associated with said trend. The androgyny trend stretches over to people who don’t fit in the social norms associated with gender and fashion, such as men with long hair, tomboys, transgender female and males, where do they/can they fit in within this trend? Is it insensitive to issues they face? Or is this removing gender from fashion or simply what looks good?
"http://i.huffpost.com/gen/278071/ANDREJ-PEJIC-DOSSIER.jpg"This rise in androgyny has not only been taking over the designs we see, it is beginning to be seen on the runways too. Designers such as Jean-Paul Gautier have been using transgender models such as male model Andrej Pejic for some times now. Andrej Pejic has been seen gracing the pages of high fashion magazines such as Dossier. With his Dossier cover in particular came backlash with many stores censoring his chest for being too explicit. ‘Dossier Co-Founder and Creative Director Skye Parrottwho explained that the bookstores asked for all copies of the magazine to be placed in "opaque poly bags because even though they knew Andrej was a man, he looked too much like a woman, basically, a move that she suspects will limit sales….It's a naked man on the cover of a magazine, which is done all of the time without being covered up, so I definitely don't think it merits this, but I understand what it is.. I think, is that it's playing with those ideas of gender roles. He's topless, you can see that he's a man, but if you look at his face, he looks like a woman and he's so beautiful, he's both in that picture, in a way. I think that's what's interesting about it." Huffington Post, 2011. Dossier’s Andrej Pejic cover censored. I feel that this statement is a perfect insight into the issues that are associated with gender bias within the industry, some may say gender has been removed here, others there is a crossover, but it is great though provoking image no one can argue different. I love that the industry is challenging the social norms, attempting break down a social taboo/bias within society with this being one of many outlets in doing so.
There is another gender bias within the design element of the industry; male/female dominance both on the catwalk and behind the scenes. In the 19th century Charles F. Worth was the first to sew his label into a garment, ‘Worth’s establishment was the first to be promoted in a manner somewhat akin to the modern “label” system.’ Vogue. Voguepedia. When looking at the modelling aspect of the industry, one can easily see that both females and males contribute equally, yet females are more admired and thus better paid. According to the ‘Forbes Model Rich List’ Sean O’Pry was the highest earning male model of 2013 earning £1.5 Million, whereas the top earning female model Giselle Bundchen earned £42 Million. A startling statistic for a generation where there is such a large emphasis on equality. An argument for this is that it is due to the assumption that the fashion industry is a predominantly female one, and thus causes some men with an interest in fashion to steer away from the industry on fear of being stereotyped. There is also an imbalance off the runway, with male dominance leading the design houses. It is an assumption that homosexual males have a great eye for design and fashion as a whole and are chosen ahead of women for design roles.
Bibliography
Lorraine Smith, 2011. Fashion and Gender [Online] Available at: http://www.thefword.org.uk/features/2011/05/fashion_and_gender [Accessed 10th March 2014]
Braukamper T. (2013) Androgynous fashion: Spring’s Evolution [Blog] 14.03.2013 Available at: http://www.fashionising.com/trends/b--androgyny-androgynous-fashion-22284.html [Accessed 10th March 2014]
VashtisVoice, 2011 [Online Video] Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBRUQoO0PQA [Accessed 10th March 2014]
Huffington Post, 2011. Dossier’s Andrej Pejic cover censored. [Online] Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/16/dossier-andrej-pejic-cover-censored_n_862424.html [Accessed 17th March 2014]
Vogue,Voguepedia – Worth.[Online] Available at: http://www.vogue.com/voguepedia/Worth [Accessed 17th March 2014]
Forbes, 2013. The world’s top-earning male models of 2013.[Online] Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/vannale/2013/10/08/the-worlds-highest-paid-male-models-2013-oprys-1-5m-still-far-from-giseles-42m/ [Accessed 18th March 2014]


Forecasting fashion

Forecasting fashion

Successful retailers need to forecast the fashions that their consumers will be seeking. Today, between each marked fashion trend, new adaptations are experienced. The ideal approach to anticipate new fashion trends is to seek relevant visual input – in vintage stores, flea markets and in the street. The latest fashion trends are always started on what clothes are worn by the celebrities. People imitate or adopt the clothes they wear. They have their own identity in creating their own style of fashion.
A trend is a general direction or movement. As a style begins to be accepted we think of it as a trend. Fashion trends demonstrate in what direction the public interest and uptake is going in terms of color, print, trim, shape, and texture in fashion and lifestyle products. Cultural interests, such as movies, books, celebrities, fashion shows and street style, influence these. Generally, most fashion trends last nearly one year, but usually the acceptable trends, last much longer. It is acknowledged that normally fashion trends re-emerge nearly every twenty years. Hence, the pegged pants legs, denim jeans and mini skirts of the 80’s are back in trend again.
Fashion basically is just wearing what is popular. Trends and fads are everywhere. They are seen on clothing racks in both high and low-end retail stores, in fashion magazines, runways and even tabloid magazines. Celebrities most of the time wear clothes that reflect their personality and style. They enjoy showing off their individuality. Even if celebrities wear street wear or luxury fashion, they are always praised and greatly appreciated for what could become the next trend. For example, the recently held BAFTA 2013 Awards witnessed celebrities wearing A-list designers in the fashion industry. The Duchess of Cambridge, Catherine was wearing her favorite Alexander McQueen dress and Anne Hathaway was found wearing the classic Burberry.
There are thousands of styles worn by celebrities that have greatly influenced the world of fashion. Celebrity styles and clothing have a great influence on individuals who value fashion. That is one of the reasons why celebrity clothing has become a big fad. Online newswires and famous magazines always feature celebrities to gain more readers. From designer’s shoes, handbags, to a stylish dress people try really hard to achieve their favorite celebrity’s look. Some people even go to the extent of copying celebrity looks displayed in magazines, which they believe are fashionable. They believe that because celebrities are wearing them and then this line of clothing could be the next season’s vogue. Consumers have the urge to buy, even if it will cost them a lot, just to have the trendiest clothes that were once worn by their favorite actors or actresses. Hence, most people accept celebrity fashion trends and are inspired by their favorite celebrities to feel stylish and follow their fashion idol. Perhaps, it is the feeling of being stylish and becoming a trend-setter that inspires them to follow celebrities fashion.
Whether it’s a fashion icon or a groundbreaking artist, it is inspiring to people and can change their life or attitude. A lot of these celebrities are looked up to and they have a big influence in fashion today. Music, movies, TV, and print all influence fashion. For example, in the 1920’s short dresses with fringe came out to dance the Charleston in, in the 1980’s there was a disco look and Cleopatra’s fashion is still used today, in costumes, hairstyles and even the cat eye. Lady gaga herself is a fashion phenomenon. She has been revolutionizing the world of fashion since 2008, diving people in support of or against her fashion, making them talk about fashion with a deeper imagination. Gaga’s originality and talent are not doubtful. She has inspired a lot of designers and many people consider her as a fashion icon.
Celebrities can influence fashion just by being seen wearing trendy clothing in a public place, like a restaurant or dance club. They also influence fashion by wearing something new and different on television or in a movie. Popular singers and rappers can spark a fashion fad by dressing a certain way at a concert. For example, hip hop artists. One particular celebrity that has been influential in the world of fashion recently in Kayne West. Kayne is an exceptionally renowned worldwide rapper, writer and, most of all, producer. He likewise has his own particular clothing line. Kayne West pioneered a lot of fashion trends that have been embraced by the hipster subculture. For instance, Kayne was the first to start wearing the brightly-colored plastic glasses that have no lenses but instead have plastic blinds. Kayne also brought popularity to blending formal wear with casual clothing. One example of this is for a man to wear a suit coat with a casual shirt underneath.
A celebrity who influenced fashion long before Kayne West came around is Marilyn Monroe. Everyone can recall, in his or her mind, the image of Marilyn Monroe wearing her white dress with a puffy skirt and standing over the heat vent with air blowing up her skirt from underneath. This image has influenced fashion decisions of generation after generation. All young ladies want to be just like Marilyn Monroe. White dresses like that are found in numerous stores everywhere throughout the country today, and that is almost one hundred years after Marilyn Monroe made that look popular. Also, Marilyn Monroe made the birthmark over the lip fashionable. Some women get their upper lip pierced and call it a Monroe, after the famous celebrity whose impact on fashion is still alive today, many years after her death. Hence, magazines play a huge role in allowing celebrities to influence the way that everyday people dress all the time, whether they are going to work, going to the club, or going to the park to walk their dog. The ways the characters in movies and television shows are dressed influence fashion trends. Also, the way people are dressed in music videos influence fashion trends.
Fashion is also mixed with artistry. In today’s modern world, realism has played another vital role in the world of fashion. Some clothing designs are inspired by art. There are a lot of famous examples. To name some, there are the Head of a Lioness by Marie Rosalie Bonheur, The Bouquet of Daisies by Jean-Francois Millet, and Ninety-Four Degrees in the Shade by Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema.
The government also makes full use of celebrity fashion trends. For example, they chose the star Chenlong in 2000 to broadcast the Chinese Traditional culture because he usually wears the chinese traditional clothing in public. This is the reason why celebrities endorse many products.
“Society has a hyper emphasis on thin and that trend comes from the consumers – it does not come from the fashion industry”[1]. Most people do not agree because celebrities unintentionally start trends with a fresh haircut or an unseen cut of jeans. Photographers click hundreds of pictures and after the photos have been published, new fashions are born. They grab the attention of both teenagers and working adults, men and women. For example, 2010 was the year of the most change. Men in Hollywood left baggy jeans and oversized shirts behind and began wearing form-fitting pants with high top sneakers. Once the trends are spotted, their influence is spread worldwide. For example, ladies flock to hair salons asking for what a certain celebrity now has, magazine in hand while men trade in their cargo pants for skinny jeans and tighter fitting tops.
People young and old want to break the mould and stand out away from their peers. They are willing to take the fashion and style risks. Glancing through a retail store and seeing the flashbacks of bangle bracelets, zebra print shoes and massive shoulder bags show the power of celebrity influence. Celebrities may not realize their influence but their trendsetting power is huge among shoppers. Celebrities and average people will always have one thing in common: they want to look nice, they want to be aware of the current trends and they want their appearance to be appreciated. But there are few people who reject celebrity fashion trends. For example, these people think that there is no point in trying to pull off a particular style in clothing and yet it never fits the body personality or body. So they choose the trends that will make them confortable instead of copying everything to the last detail.
“There is no real delineation of what is ‘child’ and what is ‘adult’ anymore”[2]. Researchers say that numerous young people are copying celebrity idols like Mischa Barton, Lindsay Lohan, Hilary Duff and Chris Martin, some barely out of their teens themselves, to grow an impression of maturity. Clothing styles are developed to make teenagers look more like an adult.
Television sets, magazine covers, Internet blogs, and movies are plastered with images of these celebrities. When a life of parties, short-term relationships, drugs, and alcohol are leading celebrities like Britney Spears, Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan to spiral out of control, people think that their life is not ideal. But, fans of these stars disagree. Celebrities influence fans to be destructively thin. Pop culture idols need to think twice before making a poor decision or practicing awful morals because of their influence on their young fans and other people who may look up to them. Celebrities do not only have a negative impact on the looks and personalities of fans, but also in their health. Hence, they need to change the way they act and how they are viewed.
Celebrities also have a positive effect on people. With so many girls influenced by the airbrushed models they see, it stands to reason that celebrities influence how girls feel about their own bodies. For example, Former star Jamie-Lynn Sigler battled bulimia, then became a spokesperson for the National Eating Disorders Association. Some celebrities are Straight Edge, who do not drink, smoke or do drugs, and as such prove clean role models for people. Comedian, Hal Sparks is can be an example. He has never done drugs, smoked cigarettes or ha one alcoholic beverage in his life.
Celebrities are usually the first to sport new looks, spurring the buying public into accepting emerging trends. Images from popular culture often provide the external basis from which teenagers will benchmark their thoughts, opinions and associations. Indeed, adolescents will forge their identities largely in conformance with these pop culture images. Celebrities affect our lives in political ways, fashion trends and lifestyle. Celebrities can use the media to change people’s interests on particular politicians. In a society that largely obsesses about entertainment and celebrity culture, celebrities can have a powerful impact on a person’s life. From fashion trends to political views, the attractiveness of a celebrity’s lifestyle can influence people’s beliefs, interests and behaviors. For example, between 1900 and 1929, the entertainment industry in New York was flourishing with different forms of entertainment, including opera, vaudeville, radio and film. Many Americans became infatuated with celebrities and contributed to a new, consumer-based culture that continues today. The influence of chic fashion can be traced back to the 17th century, and its often credited to Louis XIV and his obsession with glamorous and elegant clothing. Today, celebrities have become the trendsetters in fashion. From red carpet award shows to celebrity gossip magazines, media coverage of what a celebrity is wearing can influence a person’s decision to buy.
Some of the most popular have proven lately that they aren’t worthy role models. For instance, Beyonce has been glamorous in H&M’s new summer advertising campaign but her single, Bow Down, marks a tasteless turn in her image. Beyonce is a lady who all around her marvelously successful singing career, nailed the powerful, sassy superwoman act down to a tee. To an extent, that none other than Barack Obama hailed her as being the ideal role model for his two little girls. Her song Bow Down send a message that could backfire on her – at least with her fans who thought her as a classy and an independent woman.
Another example is of Justin Bieber. The clean, parent approved kid from Canada appears to have changed into a thug. He has been kicked out of ritzy hotels, fought with photographers, tattooed his body, turned to a vocabulary bound with foulness, and bragged while blasting his critics. He could be on his first steps to Lindsay Lohan’s awful life. Hence, the society seems to hold out celebrities like these as role models.
In conclusion, figures of celebrity status have great influence on the way people dress. But there are people who choose to fuse fashion trends or create their own kind, while others strictly follow celebrities. These people not only crave for celebrities fashion trends, they also crave for their lifestyles. For most of the people, celebrity’s lives are kind of ideal and the perfect way of living. With the advancement of technology, a lot of people look up to their favorite celebrity through Twitter, Facebook, or Instagram.
References:

Floral ditsy ptint

Floral ditsy print

Tracking A Trend – Floral Ditsy Print
Introduction.
Ditsy Print by definition is “quite small in scale, and the design motifs are usually scattered or random rather than being ordered in a definable pattern like rows or stripes”. It is most commonly featured in Spring/Summer collections alongside bright colours and soft, flowing fabrics that are associated to the Bohemian trend. It is a feature of which is now key to the two seasons and reoccurs annually just with a different colour scheme and shape to the pattern. With predictions being made already for Spring/Summer ’15 ditsy print is set to be yet another high trend of the season for another year running showing it’s popularity throughout the world.
Trend throughout the last decade.
Although the floral trend is a common feature year after year, and is set to be again for this upcoming summer, the two most popular seasons for the ditsy print, over the past decade, have to be Spring/Summer 2014 and spring/Summer 2012. These two seasons are key in the rising of the popular floral ditsy print and this is all down to the designer Mary Katrantzou. Katrantzou was the talk and praise of London Fashion Week and won the emerging talent award at the British Fashion Awards.
The signature prints and structural silhouettes that Mary has designed exclusively for us are set to make this collaboration as precious as the prized possesions that inspired it, from vivid crystal flower brooches to Qing Long Dynasty floral motif China. Mary’s prints are intricate and dazzle in paradisical shades…
This quote taken from the Topshop website, along with figure 1 shows the intricacy of the ditsy design and how the colours she has chosen to show these designs portray and compliment that. In turn, this also shows the importance and history of these influences and how the print has evolved and flourished creating what we know, love and wear in today’s society.
""Figure 1
Dolce and Gabbana’s Spring/Summer Campaign of 2011 was also one to be remembered for the promotion and rise in popularity of ditsy print. Their campaign combined the classic colours of spring such as grass green’s and flirty pink and reds with bursts of yellows and purples. The designers took inspiration from “the 70’s era with wide-leg trousers, floaty sleeves and a slight hippie, care-free style leading the way”.
Figure 2 is from the Dolce and Gabbana Spring/Summer 2011 campaign and is showing how this trend is part of a conglomeration of prints. This means that the floral ditsy trend is just a small portion of something much bigger as there are so many variations, not only of the ditsy print but of the floral print in general.
Figure 2
""
History of the trend.
Although the trend was not at its peak during the 1980’s, it was at it’s height for menswear as designers such as Scott Crolla were using the newly popular print in their collections. New emerging pop stars of that era such as Boy George, Adam Ant and David Bowie were all supporting the new trend as part of the London club scene.
Scott Crolla used ornate floral and multipatterned prints in his foppish menswear…
Galliano was also a key designer in this emerging trend taking influences from the Middle East such as fabrics and layering styles and adding to the New Romantic trend.
The following year Galliano started his own label with a collection entitled ‘Afghanistan Repudiates Western Ideal’, which combined Western tailoring with Eastern fabrics and styling.
Not only was this the start of the use of floral in menswear but also the rise of the gyspy style with patterns and softer more flowing material coming through from countries such as Romania.
The end of the 60’s and early years of the 70’s saw the start of the free spirited, loving hippies where the idea of men wearing floral originated and was completely accepted. Before this time it would have been very rare if not non existent to see men wearing floral print let alone smaller, more intricate and feminine ditsy print. Not only were men wearing more feminine prints but colours too, it was as though the line between the distinct clothing pieces for each sex was beginning to be blurred. This was being shown through men wearing more flowing, feminine clothing such as blouses and businesswomen wearing more fitted, tailored trousers. During this era, the fashion industry saw many changes such as “the replacement of the mini’s rigid, triangular silhouette by the long, svelte lines of the midi and maxi”. Paris was also beginning to loose it’s status as the Fashion capital of the World as Milan and New York were discovering their strengths in the booming industry, causing a near end to the Haute Couture trend. However Yves St. Laurent sought out this opportunity and decided to select “elements from extravagant costume to rework into eye-catching yet practical day wear”.
At a time when the craft of patchwork was being revived in Europe and the U.S, Saint Laurent took the technique upmarket, creating not only sophisticated patchwork evening wear but also a wedding dress…At another level he used humble, undyed calico and printed cottons for layered smocks and gypsy styles.
By doing this YSL added patchwork and layering to the hippie trend and even tried to promote the style to a much more upmarket audience. In turn this meant that even the hippie trend culture was much wider than people realised and that ditsy print was no longer subjected to being worn by certain classes.
Still recovering from the Great Depression late into the 1930’s and with the pre World War Two period looming closer, textiles and other everyday items still needed to be acquired cheaply. Many materials such as silks and types of rayon were still harder to obtain particularly during the war as silk was used for parachutes and powder bags. Floral prints, particularly ditsy print were popular during these two decades due to the fact that it was so cheap to manufacture as it was being produced on cotton, nylon and jersey. The pattern itself was seen as both a day and evening print due to its delicate versatility and therefore was considered the perfect attire for rations to be spent on. Ditsy print was also seen as beach wear.
Beaches blouses were often cut low at the back and sarong-style trunks or shorts were worn with bra tops in floral-printed rayon jersey.
Due to the cheap rate in which the material was being manufactured, items of clothing would easily tear and rip; therefore the concept of ‘mend and make do’ was introduced. This influenced a new era of fashion of which was seen throughout the hippie era and the 90’s where different prints, materials and colours were combined to create a distinct and bespoke garment. Many of these products featured floral designs and in the 1940’s ditsy print was particularly popular. Figure 3 is showing the way a simple ditsy print dress could be transferred from a summer day dress to evening wear just by adding a jacket.
""Figure 3
During the 1930’s many designers sought influences from international cultures and ethnicities creating a new dimension of trends of which the world had never really experienced before.
From 1934, the Chinese-Deco style was especially evident in the work of Valentia, Mainbocher and Molyneux, who were inspired by the brilliant colours of Chinese porcelain and Japanese blossom prints.
Japanese cherry blossom was a big inspiration for ditsy print during this era as it was such an easy design to replicate and manipulate to record and print into different patterns. The idea of ditsy print is mostly from Japanese influence as they have a language of flowers and wear each flower with the meaning of their mood that day. Although this isn’t the case in England or America, they took this idea a replicated it onto Kimono’s, sashes and collars.
The Eighteenth century saw changes in both patterns and materials used to create garments. This change was due to the colonisation of Europe with the rest of the world particularly as Britain occupied India and therefore made it easier to obtain cheap Indian chintz.
Babur, the first Mughal emperor of India (reigned 1526-30), was a great lover of nature…His love of flowers was shared by later generations of Mughal emperors, particularily Jahangir (reigned 1605 – 1627) who asked his artist Mansur to paint over 200 Spring flowers….became more stylised under Shah Jahan and evolved into a widely used decorative motif.
Figure 4 is showing the “painted and dyed cotton made in western India for the British Market.
""
Figure 4
The different patterns and embroideries used were used to show a divide in classes. Crown and court wore much more expensive and “elaborate woven patterns or intricate embroideries, fine lace and above all costly jewels” to show their wealth whereas the common people “wore two styles; their best dress, Sunday dress…their everyday dress showed certain divergences from it, the red cloak, the straw hat and the pattern”. The every day dress of the common people however was completely dependent on the day job they had. The style listed above was the every day wear for a poor farmer however richer farmers wore something different.
Key influences
During the year of 1843, Arthur Lasenby Liberty was born. He was the founder of one of the biggest department stores in London, Liberty’s. In the eighteen-eighties, an important shift in the business occurred as “an increasing intake of work by British designers was bought or commissioned specially for the company”.
By the mid eighteen-nineties Liberty had become synonymous with the very best of new British design.
By the 1960’s the business was booming and now Liberty’s was selling much more than just fabrics. It was now selling furniture, ceramics, textiles, costume, glass and much more, all of which changed depending on the era and whether the materials were available. “Liberty and Co. (Wholesale) Ltd was given it’s own separate organization to design and produce printed fabrics”. Ditsy print by this stage was much more commonly worn and it was due to the designer Bernard Nevill who, during the 60’s created the ‘Tana Lawn’ pattern of which was a series of different ditsy print florals. “This perennial favourtie, comprising dense ‘little floral’ patterns originated in the nineteen-thirties and was updated in the nineteen-sixties”. The rise and huge popularity of the company helped the ditsy print find its way as one of the most well-known and key prints in fashion today.
Laura Ashley is another key influence for the evolution of the floral ditsy print. Her printed furnishings and garments were at their most popular during the 1960’s. Laura Ashley’s popularity along with the booming business of Liberty’s helped boost the popularity of the floral ditsy print as these were all key trends of that era. Anyone who was anyone was wearing either a Liberty print or owned a piece from the Laura Ashley collection.
Theory of the trend.
The theory that can be applied to the whole of the text is the historical perspective.


The evolution of female underwear

The evolution of female underwear


QDC1103:Essay
 
The Evolution of female underwear essay and tasks
 
Aneesah Loonat
 

Step 1

Identify possible sources of information

 
Step 2

Read through information and highlight areas concerned

 
Step 3

Write out information in your own words and reference accordingly

 
Step 4

Write out your first draft and proof read it

 
Step 5

Write out essay

 
Underwear is one of the main necessities in our daily lives. Underwear was seen as an under garment in the days of queen Elizabeth but now days in the 21st century underwear is seen as a form of status, wealth and taste. The fancier the taste the more expensive and elaborate the lingerie. The more expensive the lingerie the less fabric or coverage-(how ironic)
Lingerie throughout history has brought woman to want to flatten, conform, mould, plump, squeeze and push out. The purpose of lingerie is to alter the woman’s shape to meet hygiene and modesty needs- although modesty is not so popular in our day and age.
The earliest form of underwear, specific to woman, came from ancient Egypt around 3000 BC women wore narrow tunics as undergarments while slaves and servants wore only simple loin cloths or went naked. This reiterates the wealth and status part of lingerie. Europe adopted and transformed the Egyptian fashion thus bringing us to ancient Greece. Women in classical Greece would wear a band of cloth to support their breasts this did not contain any hemming or sewing and eventually became two separate pieces of clothing which were called the peplos and the chiton. Both garments were ankle long but the peplos was open on one side while the chiton was open on both, this gave the public a good view of the woman she walked, she was exposed. Apodesmos was the name of what we call the modern day bra; these pieces of clothing were not meant for fashion but were meant for function and practicality.
In the Roman era woman generally had larger breasts which was looked down upon because men found it unattractive. This then introduced what is called “cotte” this was used to minimize the size of their busts. In the roman era woman wore a chemise to protect the top layer of clothing from body oils and to provide warmth. They wore these under their petticoats. Europe preferred fitted clothing that went with the shape of the body. Women did not wear underwear during this era, only men wore trousers. Trousers were considered a symbol of male power and women who wore them were wives who wanted to overthrow authority with their husbands. My guess this is where the saying “wears the pants in the relationship” is born.
The first fashionable and functional lingerie was brought about during the Ming dynasty (1368-1644). The Du Dou is similar to the shape of a bib with straps that tie around the neck and the back; similar to the undergarments in the Roman era it was also to minimize the size of the bust. This garment is still worn in today’s time but not as an undergarment but rather as an outer garment.
In the renaissance, the time where they were reforming fashion, is where the farthingale was born, this consisted of hoops that are worn under the skirt to support them into desired shapes. The Spanish farthingale was the original and the French followed in the late 1570s. This is when the Elizabethans came up with the idea of the “bum roll”, the used to wear something around their waist and under their skirt to accentuate the waist and the hips appear smaller. We now reach the “Basquine”, this is part of the farthingale, and it is a tightly fitted lace under the bodice of heavy material that is attached to the farthingale.
This soon changed in the middle ages in the late 16thcentury as the corset that minimized the waistline was introduced. The times of having big breasts were now embraced. Arriving in the earliest form 4000 years back, the corset, this was designed for more aesthetic purposes rather than practical use. The corset did not fit the user it rather reshaped the user to the fetish of the time. The corset is the most controversial garment in history because of the discussions on whether it is a symbol of status or is it for erotic appeal and whether it successfully oppressed and victimized women to conform. Over the course of time the materials used to make corsets would vary from animal bones, wood to metal rods, hooks, clips, straps and even pulleys. Woman even began to insert whalebone into the Busk (a slot down the centre front of the corset) of the cloth bodies. The Busk was also a love token which was sometimes presented to a suitor when he was interested in a woman.
The corset reached the height of popularity during the Victorian era where both men and woman would wear the corset but soon diminished in the 20th century as new support garments were introduced. This proves that fashions shifts between masculine and feminine no matter what.
During the French revolution there was a revolt against underwear. The 1700s was where women began to shun petticoats, corsets and camisoles, all symbols of French aristocracy were shunned upon as well. Women refused to wear conforming underwear, breasts became the main focus and women started to push their breasts up and out and this is where panties were introduced and were designed by Catherine de Medici.
The Victorian era (1800) introduced the pioneers of lingerie. This era marked the end of the Napoleonic wars and corseted fashion became popular again. Victoria’s Secret adopted their name from this era.
During 1829 – 1876, the first steel Busk fastening was created which allowed woman to put on and take off the corset without a hassle. The corset became elasticised which allowed more comfort. Victorian England introduced silk underwear, laced and trimmed embroideries as well as frilled pantaloons. Hoop skirts were supported by crinolines (steel structure with a corset and petticoats). Garters were now introduced to anchor the corset so it could not ride up.
1890 was when corsets were gradually been done away with and then introduced the brassiere. It was not till 1914 that the brassiere was introduced which was designed by Mary Phelps Jacobs she invented this by tying two handkerchiefs together with ribbons. Instead of pushing the breasts together the “bra” separated each breast and it was backless unlike the corset. In the 1920s the individual cup sizes followed. The brassier was pronounced more comfortable to the woman of the world than the corset. Woman in the early 1900s became involved in sports and vigorous dancing which lead them to abandon the corset and embrace the brassiere as it was more practical. At this point in history women were going towards a more streamline and almost boyish figure. World War I and the women activists at the time demanded the demise of the corset. Women started to turn to the girdle and restrictive garments that had suspender clips attached to hold up stockings this lead to the flapper look of the 1920s.
During 1923-1945, maternity wear was outsold by plus size lingerie designed by Lane Bryant for the first time by bringing in $5 million in revenue. The “bra” started to now accentuate the breasts instead of flattening them. Warner Brothers became the labellers of the cup sizes; A, B, C and D these are the sizes we use today. During the World War II there was a short supply of the materials that were used to make undergarments so this is when they started using synthetic materials such as Lycra, Rayon and Lastex. In this time period Marilyn Monroe became famous for a voluptuous and modelled for lingerie advertisements which were painted by hand in this era.
In 1947 the hourglass silhouette was revolutionized and also known as the “wasp waist” which brought the corset and girdles back into fashion to achieve this look. The push up bra was invented and designed by Frederick Mellinger. The push up bra had brought back what the corset had which was aesthetic edge and sex appeal.
The golden age for lingerie was during the 1950-1970, the 1950s had now fully embraced the hourglass figure and the bra had taken new shapes and solidified itself for every woman due to the film industry. “Sweater girls” which were made famous through stars such as Lana Turner because of the cone shaped bras, small waits and full hips. Bettie Page, ofcourse, got her name through wearing risqué lingerie in the 1940s. Joan Collins was one of the first to model the seamed stockings and curve hugging “Basques”. The freedom of not wanting to conform and have the freedom to wear what you like was during the 1960s, women’s liberation was rife at this time.
With the women’s liberation being rife a new style emerged where woman became more girly and youthful which intern introduced the baby doll night dresses and frilly knickers. In 1966 the modern bra shapes became recognizable and underwear became more playful and patterns developed. Women now had the freedom of choice.
The 1970s held more sophistication and class. Underwear materials changed, fabrics became more luxurious which introduced lace and silk.
In the 1980s technology met the brassiere. Cleavage hit the decade with a bang which introduced the creation of Wonderbra which allowed women who were not as blessed as others to have a cleavage could now afford to have one. The Wonderbra introduced the push and plunge effect which became a desirable effect for men. Padded and underwire bras became popular top selling items along with Victoria’s Secret and Fredrick’s of Hollywood all big lingerie lines. Padded, gel-filled and air-filled, staples and backless lingerie became the contemporary lingerie of the time. This decade also introduced the infamous body suit worn by Cher. Then panties took a new form and the thong as well as the G-String was introduced. Women at this stage of history have more choices available to them than ever before.
1990 introduced the newest supermodel who modelled for Calvin Klein, Kate Moss. Madonna was also one of the statement stars of this time when she wore her pointy bras from Jean Paul Gautier as outer wear on her tours. 1994 held the birth of the most iconic outdoor advert that caused several motorists to crash their cars. The billboard advert ‘Hello Boys’ who starred supermodel Eva Herizgova, she posed for Wonderbra.
From 2000 onwards underwear was the main attraction and proved that sex always sells. 2001 brought sexy back when Agent Provocateur was voted the sexiest of all time which featured Kylie Minogue and soon after Kate Moss became the face of Agent Provocateur. Dita Von Teese she is the face of 2008 by bringing vintage lingerie back into the fashion limelight. Dita brought back corsets, stockings and suspenders. Dita became the face of modern vintage pin-up.
Victoria’s Secret a name we are all aware of today is the biggest selling American brand and is internationally recognized. Their yearly catwalk shows are highly waited upon and are legendary.
Now that we have an understanding as to where our not so private essentials come from and know that they were once just a piece of cloth or had animal bone pushed into it at one stage and that it was a really painful affair to conform to society, we can be grateful for our fitting sexy underwear. Lingerie has made many statements over the years and each time it reflected the social status to a symbol of sex appeal. Woman were taught to conform and then fought to steer away from conformity so I think it is safe to say that underwear matters.


Fashion in the sixties

Fashion in the sixties

Sylvia Ayton, a fashion graduate of the sixties once said “Suddenly it was the swinging sixties; it was the most exciting, wonderful and magical time. To be a designer then was fab. We kept our bras but we abandoned our girdles, pulling on pantyhose changed our lives even more than the pill.” The sixties was a decade of far reaching change and London was the centre of it. Thanks to a convergence of music, film, fashion and social change such as the civil rights movement, sexual liberation and feminism, the sixties became the decade for the young; it was the time of the Youthquake. Poster girls of the youthquake such as Jean Shrimpton, Twiggy and Penelope Tree were often on the cover of fashion magazines such as Vogue. For fashion designers it was a time of great change, they were able for the first time to break many fashion traditions, mirroring the social movements of the time. Couturiers like Couregges and Yves Saint Laurent were among the few that embraced the new age of design and started creating clothing aimed at the youth rather than at their parents. They were also among the first that experimented with materials such as PVC and shortening hemlines.
In 1961 the LBD or little black dress which had become a genre in its own right was reborn by Hubert de Givenchy when his design featured in the film Breakfast in Tiffany’s. Givenchy designed the dress knowing the wearer well; he made the style fresher and younger and in doing so created an iconic fashion moment. Audrey Hepburn’s elfin looks and slight figure contrasted sharply with the smouldering sexuality of Anita Ekburg in her black dress in La Dolce Vita. Givenchy was anticipating a style to come. As was the designer Andre Couregges, with a background in architecture one of his first innovations in the Sixties was the white LBD, which heralded the start of a new age of space awareness. Couregges, along with designer Paco Rabanne and Cardin were some of the first designers to explore ‘space age’ looks and the use of different technologies and materials. In ’64 and as a direct influence of space travel the Parisian couturier Couregges launches his ‘space-age look’ which was both visionary and youthful in cut and appearance. The designer clothed his models; head to toe in shimmering white synthetics, - the colour, according to Couregges embodied the reflection of white - adding the colour silver which evoked the moons reflection. In addition to these colours he used slivers of Rhodid plastic plating, silver coloured sequins and vinyl discs, in the spring of ’65 Couregges’ ‘moon girls’ stepped onto the catwalk for the first time. The designer combined short slightly flared dresses with snow white wool coats, angular collars, futuristic glasses, and open toes white boots. This collection was made to be wearable and comfortable for young women; he also designed flat white boots - which are now known universally as ‘go-go’ boots - to ensure ease of movement. Paco Rabanne also used his training in architecture to push fashion technology further, the designer created sculptural dresses made from plastic discs and metal chains which often entailed using pliers rather than sewing needles during the construction. This radical experimentation was an increasingly widespread feature of elite fashion in the Sixties.
Diana Vreeland was an important figure in the Sixties; she was open to everything that was new, different and wild, thus she was an avid supporter of Couregges ‘Space Age ‘movement. She became the editor of American Vogue in 1962 and was the ‘Original High Priestess of Fashion’. Many influential designers and editors to this day describe her as the biggest inspiration for their careers. Her words were powerful and influential; she christened new trends and the people who made them with catchy headlines and metaphors. Her words such as ‘beautiful people’ and Youth quake’ sums up the creative, chic and rich vibrancy of the Sixties decade. Her arrival in ’62 had been conveniently timed, with her infinite energy and flair for the extraordinary; she not only captured the essence of the time but shaped them - putting unconventional beauties like Twiggy and Cher on the front cover, and featuring the Beatles and Mick Jagger on inside spreads, she turned Vogue into a magazine that no longer catered for just society women. Vreeland also changed the face of modern beauty, Jean Shrimpton and Penelope Tree were Vreeland girls and for the first time, models were stars and stars like Audrey Hepburn were models.
One of Vreeland girls, Jean Shrimpton was the first high-fashion model to also be a popular pin-up, her freewheeling style made it possible for a whole world of girls her age to connect with the elegant and expensive clothes she modelled. A graduate of the Lucie Clayton College, she was first spotted by David Bailey. As a couple the pair became emblems of London in the early Sixties. Bailey said ‘it’s almost impossible to take a bad picture of her and that even in her passport she looked a great beauty’. Shrimpton was a household name by the time she was twenty five, she is also credited with changing the course of popular fashion. The miniskirt may have been born on the catwalk but Shrimpton’s appearance in a mini dress at the Melbourne Cup in Australia ensured that every woman wanted one. Shrimpton was a totem for British fashion. British Vogue said of the Sixties and Shrimpton that “the world suddenly wanted to copy the way [Britain] looks. In New York it’s the ‘London Look’ and in Paris it’s ‘le style anglais”.
One of the most famous faces of the Sixties was Lesley Hornby Aka Twiggy. As a teenage model she weighed just six and a half stone, but her body matched Diana Vreeland’s description of the perfect contemporary silhouette ‘the smallest calves; the straightest legs; tiny, narrow, supple feet; beautiful wrists and throat’. Her career started as a happy accident, at 5”6 Twiggy had been told she was too short to become a model but after Leonard of Mayfair, protégé of Vidal Sassoon cut her long hair into a pixie crop for a promotional shoot, her career suddenly rocketed. This transformation twinned with the models own style of makeup which consisted of three pairs of eyelashes, painted dolly lashes on her lower lids and nude lips earned her the title of ‘The Face of 66’. Where Jean Shrimpton embodied the naturalistic side of the Sixties, Twiggy came to represent the Youth quake generation.
Across the water in America there was another Sixties icon, Penelope Tree. 1968 was the ‘Tree’s’ year, and she changed the notion of beauty. Tree not only challenged the conventions of beauty but also her illustrious lineage. Similarly to Twiggy, the Tree was created her own image, often shaving her eyebrows and attaching false lashes on the bottom rims of her eyes, she didn’t fit an ideal. In 2008 she said, “I felt I was an alien so I didn’t see anything wrong with looking like one,” Tree was also part of what a journalist in 1967 called modeling’s new “Personality Cult,” which valued qualities other than prettiness. Other iconic models such as Veruschka, who portrayed herself as an artistic bohemian and the exotic Donyale Luna, the first black model to be internationally successful were part of this ‘cult’. The Sixties was a turbulent decade for the African American community, civil rights activists used disobedience and non violent protest to bring about change. The federal government in America were able to make legislative headway with initiatives such as the ‘Voting Rights Act of 1965’ and the ‘Civil Rights Act of 1968). It was also a time where many leaders from the African American community rose to prominence including Martin Luther King Jr, Rosa Parks and Malcolm X. They risked and sometime lost their lives in the name of freedom and equality. Donyale Luna’s success as a model heralded a change in fashions attitude to African Americans. The Sunday Times Magazine hailed her as the’completely New Image of the Negro woman. Fashion finds itself in an instrumental position for changing history’. Naomi Sims was another black model who paved the way for many, after countless rejections from agencies, during the 60s her persistence led to major runway and editorial success. In 68 she appeared on the front cover of ‘Ladies’ Home Journal and had a strong presence in the fashion world. The designer Halston told The New York Times that Naomi was “the great ambassador for all black people. She broke down all social barriers.”
One designer in particular was a pioneer for coloured models, Yves Saint Laurent; he was the first ever haute couture designer to use coloured models in his runway shows. Saint Laurent’s reputation was built on his supreme tailoring; he was the first to feminise the tuxedo, with ‘Le Smoking’ in 1966. The designer believed that the trouser suit belied a sensuous femininity; paired with stilettos and a fedora the trim men’s tailoring only highlighted a woman’s figure. The timing of this new design was perfect: It appealed to the desires of the young woman who was just gaining access to birth control, political power, and an executive career. Saint Laurent power-dressing by a decade, the suit became a symbol of success for career women throughout the world. Pierre Berge, friend and business partner of Saint Laurent once said that whilst ‘Chanel gave women freedom, Yves Saint Laurent gave them power’. He was also renowned along with Couregges for pioneering prêt-a-porter. In 1966 Yves alongside his partner Pierre Berges turned away from the couture workshops and towards the accessibility of prêt-a-porter and in ’67 they opened a boutique called Rive Gauche in Paris. The Boutique sold Saint Laurent’s ready to wear collections and accoutrements like perfume, accessories and cosmetics. Also in ’66 after a brief hiatus due to the pirating of his design Couregges reopened his design house having created a tiered fashion system with three ranges, priced and manufactured on a sliding scale; Couture Future, Prototype and Hyperbole. This system was intended as a mass-marketed prêt-a-porter, with the integration of ready-to-wear into the fashion system and the cultural changes in the second half of the 20th century, this model was adopted by couture houses attempting to survive.
Mary Quant was another designer who shaped the way people dressed in the sixties, in 1964 she was responsible for taking the London Look to America and was renowned for being the British designer that made miniskirts the icon of the 1960s. Quant’s miniskirts were a far cry away from the architectural mini lengths of Couregges in Paris, she used easy jersey shapes in vibrant colours moving away from the fifties pastels. Quant also played with the proportions of classic fashion garments; scaling up cardigans and making t-shirts into dresses, she was also the first designer to dismantle the barriers between day and evening wear. Quant once said that “clothes should adapt themselves to the moment. Girls want clothes they can put on first thing and still feel good in at midnight.” (Boutique, A 60s Cultural Phenomenon, Marine Fogg). Not only was Mary Quant a pivotal influence to all female designers as an entrepreneur and an essential contributor to the youthquake movement she was an icon. She wore her own designs and epitomised the ‘dolly bird’ image of the young sixties girl and modelled the archetypal 1960s Vidal Sassoon bowl haircut that quickly became synonymous with her clothing.
Conclusion

Silk as a feminine textile

Silk as a Feminine Textile

Silk as a Feminine Textile
Silk overpowers all other fabrics, even the most luxurious when it comes to the textile that is renowned for its association with wealth, social rank, powerful positions, but most of all femininity. In this case, referring to the silk garments that have been worn by women throughout history, too wear such a fabric is to display a women status in society, whether wealthy or lower class, wearing silk, the most precious of fabrics will always enhance women’s well-being, strength and beauty. During the end of the eighteenth century, French silks were the best, most elegant, most sumptuous and most fashionable throughout all of Europe. Demand for silk was continuous throughout the era, the nation wanted everything from curtains, sheets and fabric for upholstering, to silk for delicate under garments, full petticoats, skirts and veils. Because of this high demand, women were quickly employed in the silk industry, as the good demanded a great deal of delicate stages to acquire the final produce. There have been many expressive discussions and opposing arguments, for many centuries, between numerous historians, on the very topic of the female role and status within society and the workplace during the eighteenth century. Many agree that it was a long awaited turning point for the working lives of women and that their role within the French industry is why it still stands today, whereas others debate that when these women accepted to go out and work, that they degraded themselves and their status within their family. Throughout the many thousands of years of silk manufacture, especially in China, the delicate production of silk into lavish garments has always been considered an art that should be produced and created in the palms of a woman. When the first silkworm eggs were brought to Europe and began to spread between countries, it is said that when the men spent their days farming and producing food in the fertile soil of France, the job of the women of the household was to sit and create stunning garments made from silk for the whole family. In Italy when silk manufacture was still fairly new, you would find that nuns would often commit part of their day to producing garments and items from silk. According to old chronicles, their day used to consist of; “Nine hours praying and three hours weaving”.
During the eighteenth century in France, it looked as though for some time, men were the dominant workers in the silk industry. The French were maybe the first to employ women on a large scale and not only to make use of their dainty hands but also the excellence of their brains. Soon many women were educated enough to the point that they could have easily overrun the men working in the textile industry, the women themselves had the skill and enthusiasm to outdo the men and often would work harder, turning around more profit than their male associates. Women of the trade were often the designers of the patterns that were woven in France, often travelling to Paris or London to discuss drawings and designs with other traders. Silk weaving really was, and still is considered a beautiful and skilled area of art. When a woman was domesticated, a good cook and was skilled in the industry of weaving, especially in the weaving of silk cloth, that woman was considered to almost inevitably make an exceptional wife for any man.
Although taking into account what had been written in the previous paragraphs, during the eighteenth century, the world was still in an era that positioned women to be below that of men, and was very much considered a man’s world. The French civilisation was full of discrimination and sexism against women and this would not significantly change for centuries later. During the start of the century, women had the job of staying at home, relying on their husbands or fathers to go out and work. Women were considered not worthy of being able to accomplish the tasks that were done by men and each sex was given specific rights to what they would have to oblige by. Women could not avoid their role as wife, sister, mother or daughter and could not escape from the discrimination of their wealth and sex. They were defined for being unfit for a job outside of the home and were typically considered as private beings, who should not need such a public life. The main views on women were that they obtained a lack of intelligence and their individual duty was to run the household for their family’s and husbands. Other than that they were labelled as unskilled, untrained and not particularly hard working, along with having a cunning character that made some men nervous and eager not to have them in the workplace. This of course was untrue, seeing as most women, with the exception of higher class women with a high-ranking status, had the exhausting and difficult job of housekeeping. From cleaning and cooking, raising children, making cloths to sell, as well as for their families, to becoming the family doctor and carer, there whole life revolved around hard work and dedication.
During the course and towards the end of the eighteenth century, the law that placed women into a category of a lower rank would soon begin to improve and refashion. This fascinating change was to come about during the French revolution, when the nation’s population took the chance to deposition the Kings domain and to take action in making France a fitter country that was run by its own government. The textile industry of France was in high demand and more skilled weavers were needed to keep up with the challenging market. Therefore a substantial amount of female workers were employed in the weaving business and began their training. Soon the opinion of many, that females were incapable of hard work, long hours and managing machinery soon began to fade giving women a real chance of changing the future. During this time, female workers were able to show their strength and genuine capability’s, proving to men that they were crucial to the future of the French economy.
The jobs specified to each woman would usually depend on her social situation. In the French city of Lyons, most women worked as weavers or seamstresses of cotton, linen and ribbon making, but because of Lyons dedication to the manufacture of silk, most importantly as silk spinners and weavers. Even though the discrimination against women had significantly improved, most female workers were still under paid, received the minimum wage and were usually forced to take on the grimmest and more dangerous of jobs in the weaving rooms which included being a draw girl, requiring mostly muscular strength and a lot of patience.
The women, who were related to silk masters in the industry, usually had better opportunities at working their way up in the industry and becoming skilled silk weavers, therefore gaining more social acceptance, yet they would never have been allowed to take over the men’s most dominant jobs. The women in the industry soon proved that they were a force of highly intelligent, very skilled and keen workers and they were beginning to show just how much the silk and textile industry in France relied on them. During the late seventeen hundreds, more and more women were being employed in the industry and the number soon took over that of the men’s.
Now it seemed that women were starting to dominate the silk industry of Lyon, they had finally got the chance of competing with the opposite sex in the production of textiles and could now take advantage of their new found freedom. Many thought that this was the start of an equal society.
On the other hand, women were still faced with many different problems regarding the limit of their new found independence. Women still couldn’t speak for themselves, regarding legal matters which was indeed down to their husbands or fathers who somewhat had owner ship over them. Many women proved themselves to be more capable and of having more potential than most of the men in the industry, yet they were still not able to own their own businesses and were still considered the inferior sex in the eyes of the law.
To conclude, we can see just how much the weaving industry during the eighteenth century relied on the occupation of females and how the “Golden age of silk”, along with the silk weaving business has come to be known as the enlightenment of feminism. In the exception the great inventers including Jacques De Vaucanson and Joseph Marie Jacquard, women in the eighteenth century were the major labourers during the ever changing era, making the city of Lyon capable of becoming the most important European industry for silk weaving and moving the country into the nineteenth century with wealth and pride. No longer did women have to seclude themselves, they now had the opportunity to make their mark in the world and to make a difference.


A history of fashion: regency era to modern day

A history of fashion: Regency era to modern day Properly dressed ladies wore spencers (long-sleeved jackets cut beneath the bosom) or pe...